Proof that people power really can work!

My blog on 4 December celebrated the fact that the tide might have turned in favour of recreational sea angling, following an inspiring debate in Westminster Hall about the need for urgent protection for European and UK bass fisheries, which are in danger of collapsing.  Some in the angling press rightly pointed out that this celebration might have been premature when George Eustice, the Fisheries Minister, returned from his subsequent meeting in Brussels later in the month without any agreements to protect bass stocks.  The negotiations had run into the sand.

However, the Angling Trust and B.A.S.S. piled on the pressure on government and many of our members responded to our call to write to their MPs to let them know that people really care about this issue.  Defra responded by taking proposals to the European Commission for emergency measures and these were supplemented by additional Dutch proposals.  We then asked our members to write to the European Fisheries Commissioner overseeing the process of considering these proposals and we know that hundreds of anglers did this.  Our partner organisations in the European Anglers’ Alliance did the same and we helped them apply pressure to the Eurocrats tucked away in the labyrinthine corridors of power in Brussels.

The result?  The European Commission this week announced that it would be banning all pelagic trawling for bass until the end of the spawning season at the end of April this year.  This is something that we and our predecessor organisations have campaigned to achieve for the last decade.  It just seems bonkers to allow commercial nets to scoop up vast quantities of fish just when they are about to spawn and create more bass, and this year at least, the madness will stop!

The fact that the EU has at last taken action (even if it is only a short term emergency measure for the time being) is a result of two key factors in my view.  The first is that the scientific advice was incontrovertible; the International Council for Exploration of the Seas (ICES) called for an 80% cut in catches.  Of course, the scientists had called for drastic action on several occasions before, and they had been ignored by the politicians who preferred not to rock the commercial fishing boat and to let the unsustainable slaughter of juvenile and spawning bass continue.  This time, the evidence really was stark though: stop fishing or face an immediate collapse in stocks.

As a united force for all anglers, we can make a bigger difference

As a united force for all anglers, we can make a bigger difference

The second factor was that anglers in the UK and throughout Europe stood up to be counted.  We are a huge constituency, which is potentially very powerful.  In the past, we have been far too fragmented and amateur, which has stopped us punching anything like near our weight.  This time was different; we were able to get messages out to a much larger network of anglers and to give them the relevant information they needed to contact the politicians.  We were able to provide professional briefings to politicians and civil servants.  We had the relationships with Ministers and Defra employees so that we could pick up the phone and talk to them.  This is the value of having a unified representative body for all anglers, which has forged links into a European network of similar bodies.  Any organisation can write a few letters, or put out some press releases, but to take on an issue like this and actually get something done it is essential to have a professional, integrated campaign.

Richard Benyon Quote

And it worked – despite deadlock at the Fisheries Council meeting in December, our politicians knew that they had to do something and they proposed emergency measures which became a ban on pelagic trawling for bass until April to protect spawning fish.  There’s now a lot of work to be done to put in place longer term solutions, which will doubtless include some restrictions on recreational sea anglers about the number and size of fish they can take home, but we’ve won a really important victory for sea angling and for fish stocks.  We want to build on this success and take on more battles to start the process of re-building our sea fishing which used to be some of the best in the world.

If we are to do this, we need more support.  There are a few people out there on the forums who will try and persuade you that the Angling Trust is involved in dark conspiracies to destroy angling, or that we have some hidden agenda.  We aren’t and we haven’t.  We employ professional staff, and all of them put in hundreds of voluntary hours above and beyond what they are contracted to do.  But we don’t do our jobs for the money; we are all deeply committed to protecting and improving fish stocks and fishing for this generation and the generations to come.  Angling has waited decades for an organisation to stand up for anglers in the public arena.  It now has one, which is making a real difference, and it’s high time that more than 0.1% of all anglers coughed up just £25 a year to support the work that the Angling Trust and Fish Legal do for the benefit of us all.

Join here:


2 thoughts on “Proof that people power really can work!

  1. no one angler or was the commercial u k bass sector either spoken to or asked or consulted before you went with the minister to parliament and also the eu with this rubbish. You have used aged science from one area of the channel with regards to your claim of a stock about to fall off a cliff. You have no other facts to back up your claim. Not in the rsa’s name can you claim that you have acted. Now you are going even further by having rsa restricted and no doubt other restrictions on the healthy commercial bass fishery, shame on you. Dare you to post these facts up. Copied to my timeline in case you don’t have the bottle. You certainly haven’t got the time, the nuance or can be bothered to communicate with anglers on the wsf site, more shame on you.

    • Dear Barry,

      We consulted 29,000 anglers two years ago in the National Angling Survey, more than 7,000 of whom were sea anglers. We asked respondents to rank what they thought the biggest problems facing sea angling were.

      Poor fish stocks was by far the biggest problem identified, reflecting concern that has been expressed qualitatively and anecdotally elsewhere – 69% of those who took part in sea angling rated it as the ‘most important’ issue; and the average score was 4.6, easily the highest. However, access to angling locations and managing different marine interests (both averaging 3.4) also feature fairly strongly.

      Anticipating that fish stocks was likely to be a major issue, we also asked respondents to rank what the biggest threats to fish stocks were. Over-fishing by the commercial fleet was overwhelming the biggest threat identified, with 73.2% (n=7,359) of those who answered this question saying that this was the most important threat. Its rating average was 4.7, some way ahead of Illegal fishing/lack of enforcement (average of 3.4) and damage to fish habitats (3.4).

      Over the past few years, hundreds of our members and member clubs have contacted us, asking us to take action to protect fish stocks from commercial over-exploitation. It is by far the most commonly-stated reason given by our sea angling members for supporting us.
      Not one of our members has ever questioned our campaign, which has been running for several years.

      The scientific reports on the crisis facing bass stocks are widely available on the internet and we have quoted them in press releases which are available on our web site. They are all contained as links in the notes in this parliamentary briefing paper:

      Given that all the ICES reports are from the past 3 years I don’t see how they can be regarded as “aged science”.

      The Angling Trust is not “having recreational anglers restricted”, but some restrictions are probably inevitable if politicians put in place measures to restrict commercial exploitation of bass stocks, to ensure that the measures are seen to be fair.

      We have recently agreed an efficient way of opening up discussions on a monthly basis on the WSF site whereby we will answer a number of questions that have been selected by users of the site. With a small team, it is not possible or productive for us to spend hours reading through pages and pages of internet threads involving only a small number of people, some of whom repeatedly make unfounded, personal and vitriolic attacks on us.

      I also don’t have time to open up a discussion with you on here, but your comment was so wide of the mark that I felt I had to reply on this occasion.

      All best wishes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s